General warehousing and storage · Illinois

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc

Bridgeview, IL · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc: 2.4 TCR = 41% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc safety composite

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc held a steady TCR band

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Bridgeview, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.4 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #199/551
  • PHOTO 1602 GEODIS LOGISTICS
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1602 GEODIS LOGISTICS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc averages 2.4 TCR (41% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #199 safest of 551 General warehousing and storag employers in Illinois.

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc (47 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc
Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc (47 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Chicagoland Quad Cities Express, Inc has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2021 8.2 8.2 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 2.3 2 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IL · Bridgeview

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 65 employers in Bridgeview, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1602 GEODIS LOGISTICS 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR adidas INDY, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3311 LOWE S OF NASHVILLE TN DFC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integrated Services Center 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1987-Jerseyville, IL (Monsanto Co.) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stonington, IL-Mfg 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prairie Power, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Distribution Operating - Decatur 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCNA Prairie LLC 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice : BRIDGEVIEW 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgeview 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR CC 300654 BRIDGEVIEW PLT 374 FTE
NAT-TCR U Pull and Pay - Cincinnati 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Piggly Wiggly 158 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CKS Mooresville 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0422 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pinson Valley Heat Treating Company Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE NRC NY Environmental Services - Massena 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Algin Sutton Maintenance 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE 259-NiSource-Springfield OH 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.