Sawmills · Idaho

Chilco

Athol, ID · ~196 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Chilco runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sawmills workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
112
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Chilco's OSHA Total Case Rate of 7.0 to the Sawmills BLS benchmark of 3.3 (211% of benchmark) across 8 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Chilco's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

24681012 20162017201820192020202120222023 7.83.3 Industry benchmarkChilco TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 321113.

Where Chilco falls in its industry

941 Sawmills establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 24 Sawmills employers in Idaho.

Trend analysis for Chilco

Between 2016 and 2023, Chilco's Total Case Rate worsened from 2.4 to 7.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 222% increase across 7 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 2.4, while 2019 saw the highest rate, at 10.1, a spread of 7.6 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 8 reporting years, Chilco recorded 112 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 8-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 112 injuries, 11 illnesses shown on this page for Chilco are sourced from its own 8 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 321113 - Sawmills.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2023)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

9 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 460,331 hours worked = 3.91 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Chilco (this establishment) 6.96 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 8-year avg
Sawmills industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 321113
Idaho state avg (all industries) 6.23 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Chilco to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.8 3.9 18 0 0
2022 8.2 5.8 17 0 0
2021 8.4 5.3 12 7 0
2020 7.8 5.1 14 3 0
2019 10.1 5.2 23 0 0
2018 5.9 2.3 12 1 0
2017 5.0 3.2 11 0 0
2016 2.4 1.0 5 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Chilco's reported OSHA injury record versus its Sawmills peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 211% of the Sawmills benchmark, Chilco reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Sawmills sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chilco's safety grade?
Chilco has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 7.0 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Sawmills.
How many injuries has Chilco reported?
Chilco has reported 112 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 8 years of OSHA data (2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Idaho, and by nearby establishments in Athol - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~7.0)

Similar size (~196 workers)

Nearby in Athol

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.