Welfare service centers, multi-program · Michigan

Child & Family Services - Gaylord

Gaylord, MI · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Child & Family Services - Gaylord runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Welfare service centers, multi-program workplace, earning a grade D.

Child & Family Services - Gaylord: 5.4 TCR = 143% of Welfare service centers, multi-program BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Child & Family Services - Gaylord safety composite

Child & Family Services - Gaylord scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Child & Family Services - Gaylord held a steady TCR band

Child & Family Services - Gaylord's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=12.0 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Gaylord, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/28
  • PHOTO Supported Living Off…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Supported Living Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Child & Family Services - Gaylord in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Child & Family Services - Gaylord averages 5.4 TCR (143% of the Welfare service centers, multi-program BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Child & Family Services - Gaylord TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=12 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Child & Family Services - Gaylord falls in its industry

990 Welfare service centers, multi establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 28 Welfare service centers, multi employers in Michigan.

Child & Family Services - Gaylord (41 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Child & Family Services - Gaylord
Child & Family Services - Gaylord (41 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Child & Family Services - Gaylord has fewer employees than the Welfare service centers, multi-program median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.7 5.8 3 0 0
2022 12.0 6.0 4 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.8 2.6 2 1 0
2018 8.3 2.8 3 0 0
2017 9.1 0.0 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · MI · Gaylord

990 Welfare service centers, multi-program employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 58 employers in Gaylord, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Supported Living Office 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rancho 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lifeworks Services, Inc Brooklyn Park 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR West End Center 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Otsego 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority - Service Center 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zolman Restoration, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nugent Builders, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Munson Healthcare Otsego Memorial Hospital 771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otsego Memorial Hospital 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1542 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1542 330 FTE
NAT-TCR UFP Ranson, LLC 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith Phillips Winston Salem 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 17601765 Lkq 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Redner's Warehouse Market Palmyra 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Timberhill Plae 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunoco Transportation Aloha 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE M&J Steel, LLC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bostik Paulsboro 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.