Welfare service centers, multi-program · Michigan

Child & Family Services - Oak Park

Oak Park, MI · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Child & Family Services - Oak Park runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Welfare service centers, multi-program workplace, earning a grade D.

Child & Family Services - Oak Park: 5.0 TCR = 131% of Welfare service centers, multi-program BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Child & Family Services - Oak Park safety composite

Child & Family Services - Oak Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Child & Family Services - Oak Park: 0.0 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 14.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2022

Child & Family Services - Oak Park's TCR rose 3.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Oak Park, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 131% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #21/28
  • PHOTO Wadena County Human …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wadena County Human Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Child & Family Services - Oak Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Child & Family Services - Oak Park averages 5.0 TCR (131% of the Welfare service centers, multi-program BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Child & Family Services - Oak Park TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=14.5 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=3.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Child & Family Services - Oak Park falls in its industry

990 Welfare service centers, multi establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 28 Welfare service centers, multi employers in Michigan.

Child & Family Services - Oak Park (35 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Child & Family Services - Oak Park
Child & Family Services - Oak Park (35 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Child & Family Services - Oak Park has fewer employees than the Welfare service centers, multi-program median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2021 3.9 0.0 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2018 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2017 14.5 3.6 1 3 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · MI · Oak Park

990 Welfare service centers, multi-program employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 37 employers in Oak Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wadena County Human Services 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WNCSource 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCP 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Connections 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heeren, LLC - 42 North Apples 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harbor Farmz, North LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willow Point Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE POWER & UTILITIES OPERATIONS - ROB 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brilar LLC 1,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkley Building Blocks, Avery Center 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norup International School 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administrative Office Tyndall Center 782 FTE
NAT-TCR 143600-Kapaa Po 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 050224-Anaheim Ca P&Dc 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 161503-Chi-Cardiss Collins Pstl Str 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 384613-Louisville Po 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE High Country Paving 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG1039 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG772 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.