Custodial services · North Carolina

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg

Fort Bragg, NC · ~192 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Custodial services workplace, earning a grade A.

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg: 2.0 TCR = 44% of Custodial services BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg safety composite

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg: 0.8 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.38× in 2023

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.8 in 2019 to 1.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Fort Bragg, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #57/131
  • PHOTO TRAVIS CUSTODIAL
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~192 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TRAVIS CUSTODIAL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg averages 2.0 TCR (44% of the Custodial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg TCR series: 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg falls in its industry

4,064 Custodial services establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 131 Custodial services employers in North Carolina.

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg (192 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg
Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg (192 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Chimes District of Columbia, Fort Bragg has more employees than the Custodial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 0.8 2 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 3 0 0
2021 4.4 4.4 5 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · NC · Fort Bragg

4,064 Custodial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 13 employers in Fort Bragg, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TRAVIS CUSTODIAL 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL ES 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ST ANTHONYS HOSP-PATIENT TRANS 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 53 Clark Street 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phillips and Jordan, Inc./Raleigh, NC 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens & Minor/Halyard Health 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Triad Fabco 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - MAIDEN 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Bragg 769 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC099 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR AFM East US NC Fort Bragg NC AFE NC990 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Bragg NC 59 FTE
NAT-TCR Ace Electric Inc. Statesboro 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LaCrescent-Hokah Public Schools 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Theisen's of Black River Falls 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New Ulm Precision Tool 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riverside Care Center 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaufort Jasper Water and Sewer Authority 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson Lumber & Millwork 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bang Printing 192 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.