Custodial services · District of Columbia

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress

Washington, DC · ~99 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Custodial services workplace, earning a grade A.

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress: 0.3 TCR = 8% of Custodial services BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress safety composite

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2019→2024

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress injury rate improved

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/28
  • PHOTO NMS PBU BOC HSK
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NMS PBU BOC HSK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress averages 0.3 TCR (8% of the Custodial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress TCR series: 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress falls in its industry

4,064 Custodial services establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 28 Custodial services employers in District of Columbia.

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress (99 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress
Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress (99 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Chimes District of Columbia, Library of Congress has more employees than the Custodial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · DC · Washington

4,064 Custodial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NMS PBU BOC HSK 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS IFM 3 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR QSI Bridgewater 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT W ALLIS W MIL SD 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MCN Build Inc 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE 141 - Washington DC 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3351 - DC Tenleytown 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE 104959-WDC-COLUMBIA HEIGHTS STA 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Championship Enterprises Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Properties Company, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR LAND Remediation, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nms Pbu Boc Hsk 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mikes Mechanical Services LLC 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue Bell 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3293 - La Canada Flintridge 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3274 - Anaheim East 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.