Fire Marshal Office · Washington

Chkalov Building

Vancvouver, WA · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Chkalov Building runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire Marshal Office workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.2
industry benchmark (BLS)
4
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Chkalov Building's OSHA Total Case Rate of 8.0 to the Fire Marshal Office BLS benchmark of 3.2 (251% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Chkalov Building's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.2 industry benchmark.

051015 20212022 133.2 Industry benchmarkChkalov Building TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 922160.

Where Chkalov Building falls in its industry

1,057 Fire Marshal Office establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 29 Fire Marshal Office employers in Washington.

Trend analysis for Chkalov Building

Between 2021 and 2022, Chkalov Building's Total Case Rate worsened from 3.0 to 13.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 331% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2021, at a TCR of 3.0, while 2022 saw the highest rate, at 13.0, a spread of 10.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, Chkalov Building recorded 4 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 4 injuries, 1 illnesses shown on this page for Chkalov Building are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 922160 - Fire Marshal Office.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2022)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 61,400 hours worked = 6.51 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Chkalov Building (this establishment) 8.03 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) industry avg 3.20 BLS IIF, NAICS 922160
Washington state avg (all industries) 6.20 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Chkalov Building to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 13.0 6.5 3 1 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Chkalov Building's reported OSHA injury record versus its Fire Marshal Office peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 251% of the Fire Marshal Office benchmark, Chkalov Building reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Fire Marshal Office sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chkalov Building's safety grade?
Chkalov Building has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 8.0 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.2 for Fire Marshal Office.
How many injuries has Chkalov Building reported?
Chkalov Building has reported 4 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2022, 2021). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Washington, and by nearby establishments in Vancvouver - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.