Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale · California

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ

Danville, CA · ~20 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade A.

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ: 1.0 TCR = 24% of Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ safety composite

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

84/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ held a steady TCR band

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Danville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/69
  • PHOTO Fourth Street Barbeq…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fourth Street Barbeque, Inc. SOUTH OPERATIONS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ averages 1.0 TCR (24% of the Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.1

Where Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ falls in its industry

376 Prepared meals, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 69 Prepared meals, perishable, pa employers in California.

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ (20 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ
Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ (20 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Choice Foodservices, Inc. - HQ has fewer employees than the Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · CA · Danville

376 Prepared meals, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 34 employers in Danville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fourth Street Barbeque, Inc. SOUTH OPERATIONS 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Herbalife International - Torrance 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Papettis Hygrade Egg 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bud of California Value Added Bessemer City 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 124 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0021 - DANVILLE CA WHSE 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blackhawk Country Club 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR JERO Corp 220 FTE
NAT-TCR Fairburn, GA (Samsung) 430 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Limestone University Cleaning 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Energy CSC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR South Shore Health 549 Columbian 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Donald Feed Mill 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Albany, Ms #03288 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stroudsburg, Pa #03173 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Worth, Tx #03129 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.