General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · North Carolina

CHR

Charlotte, NC · ~167 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CHR runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade C.

CHR: 5.0 TCR = 111% of General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CHR safety composite

CHR scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

CHR injury rate improved

CHR's TCR fell 2.7 from 5.6 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.0 · 111% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #91/164
  • PHOTO Atlanta (breakbulk o…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~167 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atlanta (breakbulk only) 141 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

CHR in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CHR averages 5.0 TCR (111% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CHR TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=6 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where CHR falls in its industry

3,020 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #91 safest of 164 General freight trucking, long employers in North Carolina.

CHR (167 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CHR
CHR (167 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

CHR has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 5 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 3 0 0
2022 7.4 7.4 13 0 0
2021 7.1 6.6 14 0 0
2020 7.3 7.3 14 0 0
2019 3.3 3.3 7 0 0
2018 6.0 5.5 13 0 0
2017 3.8 3.3 8 0 0
2016 5.6 4.5 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · NC · Charlotte

3,020 General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atlanta (breakbulk only) 141 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR R+L Carriers - SYR 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCT 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Butte MT FXFE-BTE 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sylvester & Cockrum, Inc. 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkdale Mills, Inc. Plant 36-37 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blind Industries - Raleigh Division 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE McRae Footwear Division- Wadeville 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR White Hills Fire Company #5 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitt Ohio - Harrisburg 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper House Strongsville 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Agriland FS - Indianola 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Boston 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baldwyn Nursing Facility 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pines at Glens Falls 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Bend 167 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.