Employer · Texas

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS

Sulphur Springs, TX · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade B.

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS: 3.5 TCR = 77% of industry BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS safety composite

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2024

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS injury rate improved

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS's TCR fell 0.6 from 3.7 in 2022 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.7 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Sulphur Springs, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #249/417
  • PHOTO BENTONVILLE HS
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BENTONVILLE HS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS averages 3.5 TCR (77% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS TCR series: 2022=3.7 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 4.5

Where CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS falls in its industry

4,064 industry establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #249 safest of 417 industry employers in Texas.

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS (33 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS
CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS (33 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

CHRISTUS Mother Frances Hospital - Sulphur Springs - EVS has fewer employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Sulphur Springs

4,064 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 49 employers in Sulphur Springs, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BENTONVILLE HS 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR QSI Perry Cook 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Building Services LTD 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 268325 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE SW Seed Company New Deal 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Houston 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tejas Feeders LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrims LIVE OPERATIONS 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grocery Supply Company 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC Enterprises Inc. 525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saputo Dairy Foods 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sulphur Springs - CMF 396 441 FTE
NAT-TCR Christensen Construction Co., Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Jupiter Aluminum Corporation JAC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid Pac Far East 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 155 - Richmond 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eastern New Mexico Medical Center - EVS 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelly Materials, Inc. - All Ohio Ready Mix 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 9 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Iron Inc.- Oroville 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.