Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Illinois

Churchview Supportive Living

Chicago, IL · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Churchview Supportive Living runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Churchview Supportive Living: 4.8 TCR = 126% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Churchview Supportive Living safety composite

Churchview Supportive Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2021→2024

Churchview Supportive Living injury rate improved

Churchview Supportive Living's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.8 in 2021 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.8 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 126% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #81/265
  • PHOTO Oxford Derby Memory …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oxford Derby Memory Care, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Churchview Supportive Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Churchview Supportive Living averages 4.8 TCR (126% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Churchview Supportive Living TCR series: 2021=3.8 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Churchview Supportive Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 265 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Churchview Supportive Living (39 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Churchview Supportive Living
Churchview Supportive Living (39 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Churchview Supportive Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 9.9 9.9 1 2 0
2021 3.8 3.8 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Chicago

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oxford Derby Memory Care, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Fountains at Washington House 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blackhawk Assisted Living 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asbury Solomons 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beck's El Paso 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Glen Nursery, Inc 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Joliet Generating Station 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Bloomington 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Woods Lumber of Independence, KS Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Switch-N-Go, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Swanillon, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR West Side Tractor Sales - Lafayette 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thoroughbred Contractors LLC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black & McDonald - Syracuse 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brilliant Graphics LLC dba Qualprint 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.