Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · New Jersey

Cim Transportation

Camden, NJ · ~25 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cim Transportation runs at 1010% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Cim Transportation: 22.2 TCR = 1010% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cim Transportation safety composite

Cim Transportation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2018→2024

Cim Transportation injury rate improved

Cim Transportation's TCR fell 5.7 from 23.0 in 2018 to 17.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 46.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=23.0 · 2019=19.8 · 2020=22.1 · 2021=17.6 · 2022=46.9 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=17.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Camden, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.2 · 1010% of ind

  • DART 17.3 DART
  • RANK #28/28
  • PHOTO Metro Metals NW
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metro Metals NW (1.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Cim Transportation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cim Transportation averages 22.2 TCR (1010% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cim Transportation TCR series: 2018=23 · 2019=19.8 · 2020=22.1 · 2021=17.6 · 2022=46.9 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=17.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Cim Transportation falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 28 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in New Jersey.

Cim Transportation (25 employees, TCR 22.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cim Transportation
Cim Transportation (25 employees, TCR 22.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Cim Transportation has fewer employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.3 17.3 6 0 0
2023 8.8 8.8 2 0 0
2022 46.9 26.8 7 0 0
2021 17.6 8.8 4 0 0
2020 22.1 16.6 4 0 0
2019 19.8 15.8 5 0 0
2018 23.0 19.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · NJ · Camden

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 93 employers in Camden, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metro Metals NW 23.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CASS NV, LLC 20.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Upstate Shredding 20.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Capital Fibers, Inc 20.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bayonne NJ 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vaspro, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Servpro of Cape May and Cumberland Counties 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Concrete Cutting Inc. 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper University Hospital 10,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 Cooper Plaza 6,439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center 2,283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Inc 1,906 FTE
NAT-TCR Cramer and Associates 22.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Carrier Services LLC 22.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ASW-Pengg LLC 22.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CPC - Cardinal Production Center 22.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ingram Readymix, Inc. - Pearland #35 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Commercial Painting North Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE WAE001 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE TXW007 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.