Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Ohio

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont

Cincinnati, OH · ~76 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont: 2.7 TCR = 82% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont safety composite

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont held a steady TCR band

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont's TCR held near 0.0 from 2.7 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #12/34
  • PHOTO 42 Oakwood
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 42 Oakwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 34 Heat treating metals and metal employers in Ohio.

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont (76 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont
Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont (76 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Cincinnati Gearing Systems Inc. - Mariemont has more employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.7 1.3 2 0 0
2016 2.7 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · OH · Cincinnati

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 42 Oakwood 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Induction Heat Treating Corporation 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Easy Drive 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TES 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walleye Power LLC - Bay Shore Plant 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Transmission Svc Ctr 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 106-NiSource-Columbus OH-Manor Park 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worley Industrial Services at Lima Chemical 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Southbridge St #00 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PT224 - Las Vegas NV Core 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston - Ford 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Action Resources - Theodore 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Praxair Surface Technologies, Inc. TAFA Division 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Mexico LLC 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Brookhaven LLC 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE PolyOne Corporation Kennesaw 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.