Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) · Connecticut

Citizens Fire Department

Seymour, CT · ~64 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Citizens Fire Department runs at 672% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) workplace, earning a grade F.

Citizens Fire Department: 21.5 TCR = 672% of Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Citizens Fire Department safety composite

Citizens Fire Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Citizens Fire Department: 18.5 → 36.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 684.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2024

Citizens Fire Department's TCR rose 18.2 from 18.5 in 2021 to 36.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 684.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Seymour, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.5 · 672% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #100/113
  • PHOTO SOUTHERN REGION : MMU
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SOUTHERN REGION : MMU (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Citizens Fire Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Citizens Fire Department averages 21.5 TCR (672% of the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Citizens Fire Department TCR series: 2021=18.5 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=684.9 · 2024=36.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Citizens Fire Department falls in its industry

793 Fire departments (e.g., govern establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 113 Fire departments (e.g., govern employers in Connecticut.

Citizens Fire Department (64 employees, TCR 21.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Citizens Fire Department
Citizens Fire Department (64 employees, TCR 21.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Citizens Fire Department has more employees than the Fire departments (e.g., government, volu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 36.7 7.3 5 0 0
2023 684.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 9.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 18.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · CT · Seymour

793 Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 41 employers in Seymour, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SOUTHERN REGION : MMU 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Township Fire Department 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTHERN REGION : BTU 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Emergency Services Station 71 21.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Connecticut - Portland 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ronnie DeMeo Construction Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookwood Laminating Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2967-CT32 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thule Group 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shady Knoll Health Center, INC 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR 226_344 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 100603 134 FTE
NAT-TCR Enterprise 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 224 Millennium Knickerbocker, Chicago 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BFI3 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Foam Fabricators, Inc. 21.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sliman's Sales & Service, Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMG 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plas-Tec Corp 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bowling Green KY FXFE-BWG 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.