Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings · Texas

City Center Management, L.P.

Fort Worth, TX · ~47 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City Center Management, L.P. runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings workplace, earning a grade A.

City Center Management, L.P.: 0.6 TCR = 39% of Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings BLS 1.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City Center Management, L.P. safety composite

City Center Management, L.P. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

City Center Management, L.P. held a steady TCR band

City Center Management, L.P.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/62
  • PHOTO HOUSTON REGIONAL OFF…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HOUSTON REGIONAL OFFICE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

City Center Management, L.P. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City Center Management, L.P. averages 0.6 TCR (39% of the Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City Center Management, L.P. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where City Center Management, L.P. falls in its industry

1,100 Lessors of residential buildin establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 62 Lessors of residential buildin employers in Texas.

City Center Management, L.P. (47 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City Center Management, L.P.
City Center Management, L.P. (47 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

City Center Management, L.P. has more employees than the Lessors of residential buildings and dwe median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · TX · Fort Worth

1,100 Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HOUSTON REGIONAL OFFICE 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Killian Pacific 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zilber Ltd. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RHP Properties 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blackstone Dilworth 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartley Feeders 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Handley Station 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. Pearsall Energy Center 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Colon 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisiana-Pacific Newberry 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City Hall 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Industrial Steel & Wire 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Valley Training Center, RAPID South 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smucker Fruit Processing Co. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maintenance Service Experts, LLC 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.