Fire and rescue service · California

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6

Anaheim, CA · ~30 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 runs at 732% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire and rescue service workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6: 23.4 TCR = 732% of Fire and rescue service BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 safety composite

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.0

2017→2020

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 injury rate improved

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6's TCR fell 18.0 from 40.9 in 2017 to 22.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 40.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=40.9 · 2018=13.0 · 2019=16.8 · 2020=22.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.4 · 732% of ind

  • DART 18.7 DART
  • RANK #74/87
  • PHOTO Gresham Fire & Emerg…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gresham Fire & Emergency Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 averages 23.4 TCR (732% of the Fire and rescue service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 TCR series: 2017=40.9 · 2018=13 · 2019=16.8 · 2020=22.9 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 falls in its industry

793 Fire and rescue service establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 87 Fire and rescue service employers in California.

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 (30 employees, TCR 23.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6
City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 (30 employees, TCR 23.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

City of Anaheim, Fire Station #6 has fewer employees than the Fire and rescue service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 22.9 18.7 6 5 0
2019 16.8 4.2 3 5 0
2018 13.0 6.5 3 3 0
2017 40.9 10.8 6 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · CA · Anaheim

793 Fire and rescue service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gresham Fire & Emergency Services 23.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Station 23 Hillsboro 23.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tulare County Fire 23.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eugene/Springfield Administration 23.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE BZNUR 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1780 San Juan Rd. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Oaks 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenfields Turf, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Jobs On Site 23.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Peak 14 Moving 23.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillside Heights LLC 23.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bridge at Farmington Assisted Living 23.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Es Glenoaks Hosp 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Traverse City Hospice 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Metals Technologies 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE LCS:LC046 - LC046-Chesapeake, VA 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.