Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · California

City of Azusa - Business Licensing

Azusa, CA · ~336 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Azusa - Business Licensing runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade C.

City of Azusa - Business Licensing: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Azusa - Business Licensing safety composite

City of Azusa - Business Licensing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

City of Azusa - Business Licensing held a steady TCR band

City of Azusa - Business Licensing's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Azusa, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/149
  • PHOTO Pima County Superior…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~336 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pima County Superior Court- APO South (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

City of Azusa - Business Licensing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Azusa - Business Licensing averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Azusa - Business Licensing TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Azusa - Business Licensing falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 149 Executive offices, federal, st employers in California.

City of Azusa - Business Licensing (336 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Azusa - Business Licensing
City of Azusa - Business Licensing (336 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Azusa - Business Licensing has more employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · CA · Azusa

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 73 employers in Azusa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pima County Superior Court- APO South 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Civil Service 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chatt - Development Resource Center 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chatt - General Fund 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Channel Islands Berry Farms, Inc. 336 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prima Wawona - Plant 4 336 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 359 336 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Azusa - Public Works 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGSP-E654 991 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-E650 989 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Azusa 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Azusa - Building Maintenance 336 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tech Center 336 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0662 - Burlington Wa Whse 336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Americold Westgate, Atlanta GA 336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Government Center 336 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.