Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · Michigan

City of Birmingham

Birmingham, MI · ~342 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Birmingham runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Birmingham: 5.2 TCR = 163% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Birmingham safety composite

City of Birmingham scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2023

City of Birmingham injury rate improved

City of Birmingham's TCR fell 3.4 from 7.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=5.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2023=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Birmingham, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 163% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #41/79
  • PHOTO City of Annapolis
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~342 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Annapolis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

City of Birmingham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Birmingham averages 5.2 TCR (163% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Birmingham TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=8 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=5 · 2021=3.9 · 2023=3.6 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Birmingham falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 79 Executive offices, federal, st employers in Michigan.

City of Birmingham (342 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Birmingham
City of Birmingham (342 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Birmingham has more employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.6 2.0 9 0 0
2021 3.9 2.2 8 1 0
2019 5.0 5.0 12 0 0
2018 3.8 0.8 9 0 0
2017 8.0 3.1 18 0 0
2016 7.0 2.6 15 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · MI · Birmingham

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 14 employers in Birmingham, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Annapolis 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bertie County Government 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Menahga 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sangamon County 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lane Automotive, Inc. 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5160 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE 000006872 - GM WARREN ANNEX B - HOUSEKEEPING 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Piping Industries 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1000 - BELFOR Birmingham MI 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10641 Birmingham 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Townsend Hotel 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR L.A. Master Holdings, LLC 138 FTE
NAT-TCR NHC Healthcare, Bluffton 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lapp Electric 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkdale America LLC Plant 24 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Krystal Companies LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE A&C Business Enterprises 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE Books and Library Services 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE Total Development Solutions 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casa Systems, Inc. 342 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.