General services departments, government · Connecticut

City of Bridgeport - General Government

Bridgeport, CT · ~382 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Bridgeport - General Government runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Bridgeport - General Government: 4.3 TCR = 133% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Bridgeport - General Government safety composite

City of Bridgeport - General Government scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Bridgeport - General Government: 3.0 → 12.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

City of Bridgeport - General Government's TCR rose 9.1 from 3.0 in 2018 to 12.2 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Bridgeport, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #60/124
  • PHOTO City Hall
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~382 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City Hall (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

City of Bridgeport - General Government in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Bridgeport - General Government averages 4.3 TCR (133% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Bridgeport - General Government TCR series: 2018=3 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1 · 2022=12.2 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Bridgeport - General Government falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 124 General services departments, employers in Connecticut.

City of Bridgeport - General Government (382 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Bridgeport - General Government
City of Bridgeport - General Government (382 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Bridgeport - General Government has more employees than the General services departments, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 12.2 0.0 4 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 3 0 0
2020 0.9 0.0 3 0 0
2018 3.0 1.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CT · Bridgeport

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 150 employers in Bridgeport, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City Hall 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forsyth County-All Other Employees 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Faribault - Buckham Center 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Stone County 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sperry Rail, Inc. 382 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Office 381 FTE
STATE-SIZE ELIM PARK BAPTIST HOME INC 381 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yarde Metals, Inc.: Connecticut 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgeport Hospital 3,332 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Vincent's Medical Center - Bridgeport Campus 2,340 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENTS MEDICAL CENTER - BRIDGEPORT 2,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-CTBRI1 2,079 FTE
NAT-TCR 9123-Pbi-Prime Appearance 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Maverick Richburg, SC 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 2904-ASM-AZ 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nybla - Black River 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0030-0030-03195 382 FTE
NAT-SIZE YCC 382 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manheim Nashville 382 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4506 Panama City Mill 382 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.