City and town councils · Montana

City of Chinook

Chinook, MT · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Chinook runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical City and town councils workplace, earning a grade A.

City of Chinook: 1.3 TCR = 42% of City and town councils BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Chinook safety composite

City of Chinook scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2020→2023

City of Chinook injury rate improved

City of Chinook's TCR fell 5.3 from 5.3 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=5.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921120 · Chinook, MT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P86
  • PHOTO Minnesota House of R…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minnesota House of Representatives (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

City of Chinook in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Chinook averages 1.3 TCR (42% of the City and town councils BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Chinook TCR series: 2020=5.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Chinook falls in its industry

158 City and town councils establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
City of Chinook (26 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Chinook
City of Chinook (26 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 5.6

City of Chinook has fewer employees than the City and town councils median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921120 · MT · Chinook

158 City and town councils employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 3 employers in Chinook, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minnesota House of Representatives 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Mount Pleasant 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks & Recreation 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Ledyard 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parke Logging Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rainbow Dam 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheridan Electric Co-op, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guy Tabacco Construction 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blaine County 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sweet Memorial Nursing Home 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Hitachi Astemo Electric Motor Systems America, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenfields Turf, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Extrudex, LP 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Haynes International Arcadia Tubular facility 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kalwall Corporation-Kalcurve 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Young & Bertke Air Systems Co. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waste Partners 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE All West Select Sire 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.