Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · California

City of Commerce

Commerce, CA · ~382 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Commerce runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Commerce: 5.5 TCR = 173% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Commerce safety composite

City of Commerce scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2017→2024

City of Commerce injury rate improved

City of Commerce's TCR fell 4.6 from 8.1 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.1 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=4.1 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Commerce, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 173% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #110/149
  • PHOTO CITY OF JERSEYVILLE
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~382 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CITY OF JERSEYVILLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

City of Commerce in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Commerce averages 5.5 TCR (173% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Commerce TCR series: 2017=8.1 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=5 · 2020=4.1 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Commerce falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #110 safest of 149 Executive offices, federal, st employers in California.

City of Commerce (382 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Commerce
City of Commerce (382 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Commerce has more employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 1.3 8 0 0
2023 5.8 1.8 13 0 0
2022 6.8 3.4 13 1 1
2020 4.1 1.0 8 0 0
2019 5.0 1.1 18 0 0
2018 5.5 4.6 18 0 0
2017 8.1 3.4 26 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · CA · Commerce

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 163 employers in Commerce, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CITY OF JERSEYVILLE 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elections 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Lino Lakes 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Wickenburg 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE A Perez FLC, Inc. 382 FTE
STATE-SIZE Teichert Construction Woodland 382 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWIFT BEEF CO. 382 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2750 S Towne Ave 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferguson Complex 2,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 587 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCAM, LLC 1,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DLA3 771 FTE
NAT-TCR BOS-D 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dayton Mill 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pittsburgh International Airport 40VN 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Certified Electric, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Willow Philly Enid Plant 382 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockport Township Park District 382 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joliet Township High School District 204 - Central Campus 382 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greensboro 017 382 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.