City and town councils · Arizona

City of Kingman

Kingman, AZ · ~412 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

City of Kingman runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical City and town councils workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.2
industry benchmark (BLS)
38
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares City of Kingman's OSHA Total Case Rate of 7.0 to the City and town councils BLS benchmark of 3.2 (218% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

City of Kingman's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.2 industry benchmark.

24681012 20162021 2.73.2 Industry benchmarkCity of Kingman TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 921120.

Where City of Kingman falls in its industry

184 City and town councils establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 City and town councils employers in Arizona.

Trend analysis for City of Kingman

Between 2016 and 2021, City of Kingman's Total Case Rate improved from 11.3 to 2.7 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 76% decrease across 5 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2021, at a TCR of 2.7, while 2016 saw the highest rate, at 11.3, a spread of 8.6 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, City of Kingman recorded 38 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 38 injuries, 10 illnesses shown on this page for City of Kingman are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 921120 - City and town councils.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2021)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

7 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 1,126,507 hours worked = 1.24 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
City of Kingman (this establishment) 6.97 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) industry avg 3.20 BLS IIF, NAICS 921120
Arizona state avg (all industries) 4.73 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by City of Kingman to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.7 1.2 12 3 0
2016 11.3 6.5 26 7 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on City of Kingman's reported OSHA injury record versus its City and town councils peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 218% of the City and town councils benchmark, City of Kingman reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider City and town councils sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is City of Kingman's safety grade?
City of Kingman has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 7.0 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.2 for City and town councils.
How many injuries has City of Kingman reported?
City of Kingman has reported 38 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2021, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Arizona, and by nearby establishments in Kingman - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.