Public property management services, government · California

City of Mountain View

Mountain View, CA · ~933 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Mountain View runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Public property management services, government workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Mountain View: 5.3 TCR = 165% of Public property management services, government BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Mountain View safety composite

City of Mountain View scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2017→2024

City of Mountain View injury rate improved

City of Mountain View's TCR fell 1.8 from 6.7 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.7 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Mountain View, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 165% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #131/256
  • PHOTO City of Phoenix E50 …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 243 inj
  • SIZE ~933 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Phoenix E50 PhxConCntr (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

City of Mountain View in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Mountain View averages 5.3 TCR (165% of the Public property management services, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Mountain View TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2018=6 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=0 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Mountain View falls in its industry

1,496 Public property management ser establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #131 safest of 256 Public property management ser employers in California.

City of Mountain View (933 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Mountain View
City of Mountain View (933 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Mountain View has more employees than the Public property management services, gov median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 1.9 32 7 0
2023 6.4 1.6 40 9 0
2022 6.9 4.3 46 6 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.2 1.3 47 0 0
2018 6.0 1.2 42 2 0
2017 6.7 1.3 36 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · Mountain View

1,496 Public property management services, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 151 employers in Mountain View, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Phoenix E50 PhxConCntr 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Flagstaff 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Fergus Falls 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shelby County 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sutter Bay Hospitals (30614) 933 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carlsbad - US Remote 933 FTE
STATE-SIZE JR Custom Harvesting Co., Inc. 934 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enjoy Technology 934 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waymo HQ 1,846 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waymo RLS 1,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30806) 1,158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-30331) 999 FTE
NAT-TCR Paramount Contracting, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Ncc Main Campus Food Court 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tulsa 195 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cape Romain Contractors 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE SMC Corporation of America 933 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willis-Knighton South and the Center for Women's Health 933 FTE
NAT-SIZE Family Services 933 FTE
NAT-SIZE CCA Davison Rd Processing Center 933 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.