Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) · Minnesota

City of Rosemount Fire Department

Rosemount, MN · ~49 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Rosemount Fire Department runs at 387% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Rosemount Fire Department: 12.4 TCR = 387% of Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Rosemount Fire Department safety composite

City of Rosemount Fire Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 12.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 24.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Rosemount Fire Department: 0.0 → 41.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 41.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2021

City of Rosemount Fire Department's TCR rose 41.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 41.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Rosemount, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 387% of ind

  • DART 24.8 DART
  • RANK #21/38
  • PHOTO Inverness Fire Prote…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Inverness Fire Protection District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Rosemount Fire Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Rosemount Fire Department averages 12.4 TCR (387% of the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Rosemount Fire Department TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=41.4 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Rosemount Fire Department falls in its industry

793 Fire departments (e.g., govern establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 38 Fire departments (e.g., govern employers in Minnesota.

City of Rosemount Fire Department (49 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Rosemount Fire Department
City of Rosemount Fire Department (49 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

City of Rosemount Fire Department has fewer employees than the Fire departments (e.g., government, volu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 41.4 24.8 4 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 10.7 10.7 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · MN · Rosemount

793 Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 60 employers in Rosemount, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Inverness Fire Protection District 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KLAMATH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 1 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Charleston - Fire Department 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1096 Wood Dale FPD 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Impact Power Solutions 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lodermeier's Inc 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glass & Mirror Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Building Systems, Ltd 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent School District 196 4,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 917 Rosemount 559 FTE
NAT-TCR Builders Installed Products #336 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00192 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-OKCCX0178 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bickford of Iowa City 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Customer Service North 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joliet Cabinet Co. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Justin Ready Mix Plant 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.