Fire Protection · California

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011)

Sacramento, CA · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) runs at 511% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire Protection workplace, earning a grade F.

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011): 16.4 TCR = 511% of Fire Protection BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) safety composite

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2022→2023

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) injury rate improved

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011)'s TCR fell 9.0 from 20.9 in 2022 to 11.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 20.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=20.9 · 2023=11.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.4 · 511% of ind

  • DART 11.8 DART
  • RANK #44/87
  • PHOTO Fire Station #3
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fire Station #3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) averages 16.4 TCR (511% of the Fire Protection BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) TCR series: 2022=20.9 · 2023=11.8 · BLS 3.2

Where City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) falls in its industry

793 Fire Protection establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 87 Fire Protection employers in California.

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) (34 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011)
City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) (34 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

City Of Sacramento-Fire Prevention Roll-Up (120011) has fewer employees than the Fire Protection median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.8 11.8 2 2 0
2022 20.9 17.9 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · CA · Sacramento

793 Fire Protection employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fire Station #3 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beach Fire Protection District 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange County Fire Authority 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of International Falls (Fire / EMS) 16.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR West Rock Shop 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanford Location 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland-Gateway #013 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0005-0005-02810 16.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kennesaw 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sicora, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCoys Building Supply-Galveston 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hofmann Sinking Spring Plant 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.