Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · Minnesota

City of Sartell

Sartell, MN · ~84 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Sartell runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Sartell: 6.0 TCR = 189% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Sartell safety composite

City of Sartell scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2024

City of Sartell injury rate improved

City of Sartell's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.9 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=14.5 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=6.2 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Sartell, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 189% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #78/139
  • PHOTO City of Circle Pines
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Circle Pines (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Sartell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Sartell averages 6.0 TCR (189% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Sartell TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=14.5 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=6.2 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Sartell falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 139 Executive offices, federal, st employers in Minnesota.

City of Sartell (84 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Sartell
City of Sartell (84 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Sartell has fewer employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 6.2 1.6 3 1 0
2020 8.2 8.2 0 5 0
2019 14.5 7.2 7 1 0
2018 5.1 5.1 3 0 0
2017 3.9 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · MN · Sartell

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 38 employers in Sartell, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Circle Pines 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Montclair 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of Lake in the Hills 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of North Bend - North Bend Police Department 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Newport Service Center 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE OlympiaTech Electric 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Office 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent School District #748 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR COUNTRY MANOR HLTH & REHAB CENTER 486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Country Manor Campus LLC 453 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dezurik 398 FTE
NAT-TCR Phrg Phx 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Electric Supply Company LLC - Whittier, CA 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hayden 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PHMG PHSW Clinics 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florida Coast Logistics 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chandler, AZ 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Melbourne Fl 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crypton LLC 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.