Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · Georgia

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI

Atlanta, GA · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI runs at 403% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI: 4.8 TCR = 403% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI safety composite

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI: 0.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2022

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI's TCR rose 4.8 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 403% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #16/22
  • PHOTO City of Yakima Waste…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Yakima Wastewater (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI averages 4.8 TCR (403% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=4.8 · BLS 1.2

Where City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 22 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in Georgia.

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI (33 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI
City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI (33 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

City of South Fulton Public Works - OMI has fewer employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2021 9.2 9.2 3 0 0
2020 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · GA · Atlanta

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Yakima Wastewater 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Corvallis Wastewater Reclamation Plant 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Marin Sanitation Agency 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cairo 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pullet/Breeder Facility 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Gin & Peanut Co., Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE GRP Madison 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR 050282-Aptos Po 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 484695-Kilgore Po 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 482040-Corsicana Po 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 266360-Minneapolis Po 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 548334-Tac-Downtown Sta 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG802 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 543276-Graham Po 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 545572-Monroe Po 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.