Fabricated structural metal manufacturing · Mississippi

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division

Rosedale, MS · ~137 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fabricated structural metal manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division: 2.0 TCR = 59% of Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division safety composite

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2022

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division injury rate improved

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.9 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Rosedale, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 59% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #7/21
  • PHOTO Sabre Industries Uti…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sabre Industries Utilities Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division averages 2.0 TCR (59% of the Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division falls in its industry

1,491 Fabricated structural metal ma establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 21 Fabricated structural metal ma employers in Mississippi.

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division (137 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division
Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division (137 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Cives Steel Company, Mid-South Division has more employees than the Fabricated structural metal manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2021 2.8 0.7 4 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 3.3 2.7 5 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 1.9 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · MS · Rosedale

1,491 Fabricated structural metal manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 7 employers in Rosedale, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sabre Industries Utilities Division 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simpson Strong Tie 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acco Attalla 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thomas Industrial Fabrication 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE EcoWater Systems Ripley 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1166 LOWE S OF COLUMBUS MS 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2563 LOWE S OF LAUREL MS 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE 025-00447 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Axel Americas, LLC 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Axel Americas MS 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosedale, MS Fert Term 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosedale 21 FTE
NAT-TCR 4326 Springfield MA Sheet Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Manheim Dallas 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR King Ranch Florida Farm 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR El Segundo Ca Depot 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4340 Aston Container 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dimensions Management of Chippewa Falls 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus Hospice of GA 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Biltrite Inc. (Moorestown, NJ) 137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.