Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing · California

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp.

Fullerton, CA · ~240 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp.: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. safety composite

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2018→2022

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. injury rate improved

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 5.2 in 2018 to 3.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.2 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311412 · Fullerton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #8/27
  • PHOTO Rossville Manufactur…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~240 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rossville Manufacturing Facility - KNA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. TCR series: 2018=5.2 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3 · BLS 3.3

Where CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. falls in its industry

274 Frozen food entrees (except se establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 27 Frozen food entrees (except se employers in California.

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. (240 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 201 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp.
CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. (240 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 201 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. has more employees than the Frozen food entrees (except seafood base median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.0 3.0 8 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 5 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 4 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 4 0 0
2018 5.2 5.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311412 · CA · Fullerton

274 Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 167 employers in Fullerton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rossville Manufacturing Facility - KNA 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toluca 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milwaukee WI (Sandwich Bros) 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Groveport OH Facility 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village Nurseries Steele Valley Yard 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Super Store Industries - Turlock 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mendocino Forest Products 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Global 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA692 ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER HR 2,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR SASCO 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Fullerton 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fullerton / Orange 636 FTE
NAT-TCR Shoreline Power Services 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Longwood Health and Rehabilitation Center 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0104 Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp. - Crete 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pittsburgh Blue, Maple Grove 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Madison County Services 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-ASM-WI 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE SEABOX Riverton Nj 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burford's Tree LLC - 344 240 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.