Anchored earth retention contractors · Ohio

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC

Columbus, OH · ~157 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anchored earth retention contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC: 1.2 TCR = 44% of Anchored earth retention contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC safety composite

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2020

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Columbus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #14/34
  • PHOTO Pinto
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~157 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pinto (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC averages 1.2 TCR (44% of the Anchored earth retention contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC falls in its industry

932 Anchored earth retention contr establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 34 Anchored earth retention contr employers in Ohio.

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC (157 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC
C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC (157 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC has more employees than the Anchored earth retention contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.6 0.9 6 0 0
2019 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2018 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · OH · Columbus

932 Anchored earth retention contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pinto 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lynnhaven Marine and Dock, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Herzog Technologies, Inc. - SunRail 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Rail (Boston) 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE everdry waterproofing 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&G Foods North America Inc., Crisco Plant 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE K055-M001 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE LAND O LAKES INC - KENT OH 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Ross store 1491 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Centrica Business Solutions - Solar 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Recro Gainesville Development 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucson 624 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 84 Lawrence, Ny 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Catalina Post Acute & Rehabilitation 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bartlett Cocke General Contractors (Central Texas Region) 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaufont Health and Rehabiliation Center 157 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.