Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Clackamas View Senior Living

Milwaukee, OR · ~20 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clackamas View Senior Living runs at 567% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Clackamas View Senior Living: 21.6 TCR = 567% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clackamas View Senior Living safety composite

Clackamas View Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.5

2017→2022

Clackamas View Senior Living injury rate improved

Clackamas View Senior Living's TCR fell 9.5 from 29.2 in 2017 to 19.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 30.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=29.2 · 2018=23.4 · 2019=30.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=27.1 · 2022=19.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Milwaukee, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.6 · 567% of ind

  • DART 13.1 DART
  • RANK #205/218
  • PHOTO GOLD QUARTZ RETIREME…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GOLD QUARTZ RETIREMENT INN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Clackamas View Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clackamas View Senior Living averages 21.6 TCR (567% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clackamas View Senior Living TCR series: 2017=29.2 · 2018=23.4 · 2019=30 · 2020=0 · 2021=27.1 · 2022=19.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Clackamas View Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #205 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Clackamas View Senior Living (20 employees, TCR 21.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Clackamas View Senior Living
Clackamas View Senior Living (20 employees, TCR 21.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Clackamas View Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 19.7 13.1 3 0 0
2021 27.1 27.1 1 3 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 30.0 22.5 4 0 0
2018 23.4 23.4 3 0 0
2017 29.2 21.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Milwaukee

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 3 employers in Milwaukee, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GOLD QUARTZ RETIREMENT INN 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY WILLOW CROSSINGS OPERATION LLC 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Long Community 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY MILFORD OPERATIONS LLC 21.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yamhela Vineyard 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roe Vineyard 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Battle Creek Vineyard 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liepold Farms 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kellogg Creek WRRF Improvement 16 FTE
NAT-TCR Olive Grove Real Estate LLC 21.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 072344-Den-Park Hill Sta 21.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverview Pointe Care Center 21.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gold Medal Service East 21.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coastal Bend Outpatient Surgery Center 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Enfield Division of Buildings and Grounds 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holmdel 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1246 -LH - Live Oak, FL 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.