Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing · Ohio

Clark-Reliance

Strongsville, OH · ~215 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clark-Reliance runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Clark-Reliance: 3.2 TCR = 97% of Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clark-Reliance safety composite

Clark-Reliance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2021

Clark-Reliance injury rate improved

Clark-Reliance's TCR fell 2.4 from 4.2 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Strongsville, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #18/18
  • PHOTO Hurco
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~215 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hurco (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Clark-Reliance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clark-Reliance averages 3.2 TCR (97% of the Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clark-Reliance TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Clark-Reliance falls in its industry

322 Controllers for process variab establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 18 Controllers for process variab employers in Ohio.

Clark-Reliance (215 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Clark-Reliance
Clark-Reliance (215 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Clark-Reliance has more employees than the Controllers for process variables (e.g., median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.8 0.6 3 0 0
2020 3.7 1.1 7 0 0
2019 2.5 2.0 5 0 0
2018 3.3 0.9 6 1 0
2017 3.7 2.8 7 1 0
2016 4.2 1.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · OH · Strongsville

322 Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 104 employers in Strongsville, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hurco 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Double EE Service, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCoy Global Cedar Park 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne Hastings Instruments 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 7 Commerce Parkway 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE Groveport Call Center 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crane Carrier Company, LLC 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 014-00412 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Strongsville Family Health & Surgery Center 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Strongsville Fam Hlth Surg Ctr 415 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2266 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2266 372 FTE
NAT-TCR 3794 No Frills (Plattsmouth, Ne) 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Coleman - SRMN 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gavilon Fertilizer - Catoosa West 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Homer FS (SSS,SAT) 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Resolute Tissue Hialeah Mill 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heron Therapeutics San Diego 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bend Memorial Clinic Eastside 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indian Summer Coop 215 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.