Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Clarks Feed Mills

Shamokin, PA · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clarks Feed Mills runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Clarks Feed Mills: 3.0 TCR = 77% of Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clarks Feed Mills safety composite

Clarks Feed Mills scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2024

Clarks Feed Mills injury rate improved

Clarks Feed Mills's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Shamokin, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/42
  • PHOTO Precision Science
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Science (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Clarks Feed Mills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clarks Feed Mills averages 3.0 TCR (77% of the Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clarks Feed Mills TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.9

Where Clarks Feed Mills falls in its industry

756 Animal feeds, prepared (except establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 42 Animal feeds, prepared (except employers in Pennsylvania.

Clarks Feed Mills (25 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Clarks Feed Mills
Clarks Feed Mills (25 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Clarks Feed Mills has fewer employees than the Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.3 7.5 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.8 7.8 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · PA · Shamokin

756 Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 5 employers in Shamokin, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Science 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reynolds 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAN AMERICAN GRAIN COMPANY-CORUJO 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition - Stockton 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer New Holland NHL1 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunterstown Power Generation 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Producer 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warren Electric Cooperative, Inc. 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR 417608-SHAMOKIN PO 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHAMOKIN_1381311 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR REN009 Shamokin 22 FTE
NAT-TCR 1038 - BELFOR Indianapolis IN 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Five Star Sheets, LLC. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AdventHealth Wauchula 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Knoxville 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kenton Pointe Assisted Living Community 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sedwall Manufacturing Company 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE MH Charleston 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Child & Family Services - Lansing 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.