Skilled nursing facilities · West Virginia

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC

Charleston, WV · ~88 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC: 6.0 TCR = 93% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC safety composite

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2017→2018

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC injury rate improved

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC's TCR fell 1.8 from 7.0 in 2017 to 5.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.0 · 2018=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Charleston, WV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.0 · 93% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #53/171
  • PHOTO Hanging Rock LTC, LL…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hanging Rock LTC, LLC d/b/a Somerwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · West Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC averages 6.0 TCR (93% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC TCR series: 2017=7 · 2018=5.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to West Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 171 Skilled nursing facilities employers in West Virginia.

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (88 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC
Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (88 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.1 5.1 4 0 0
2017 7.0 5.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WV · Charleston

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,269 rated employers in West Virginia with headcount on file · 158 employers in Charleston, WV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hanging Rock LTC, LLC d/b/a Somerwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Center of Columbia, TN 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HERITAGE PARK 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 476 BEL-AIRE CENTER 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Felman Production LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kanawha Scales and Systems 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE 029-00763 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Ridge Center 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAMC Memorial Hospital 3,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAMC Memorial Division 3,374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital 3,232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston Area Medical Center General Division 1,990 FTE
NAT-TCR Penske : 4383-00 GM-CCA/Flint, MI 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR N and R of Odessa LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Caribbean Fire & Associates, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tfrirv-Tfr-Tfr - Irving 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waverly Health Care and Rehabilitation 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bombardier Transportation - Dallas - DFW 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0196 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Camdenton (Mocam) 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.