Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Indiana

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc.

Huntingburg, IN · ~38 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc.: 1.2 TCR = 26% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. safety composite

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2024

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. injury rate improved

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.9 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Huntingburg, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/125
  • PHOTO Fort Worth- Dry Bulk…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fort Worth- Dry Bulk Transport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. averages 1.2 TCR (26% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. falls in its industry

3,252 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 125 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in Indiana.

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc.
Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Classic Bulk Carriers, Inc. has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · IN · Huntingburg

3,252 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 43 employers in Huntingburg, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fort Worth- Dry Bulk Transport 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renville Terminal 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sibley and Sons Construction Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR VASCOR transport, Ltd 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenleaf Holdco LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Poultry Services, MPS Egg Farms 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yale Corteva 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marion Svc Ctr Bldg 1 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Farbest Foods Huntingburg 729 FTE
CITY-NEAR OFS BRANDS CORPORATE OFFICE 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwest Dubois County School Corporation 302 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntingburg Operations 160 FTE
NAT-TCR Pfizer Kalamazoo - Portage Road 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR New England Communications 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gray Mechanical Contractors, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1665 S. 5350 West Salt Lake City UT 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Estates at Linden 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn Louisville Downtown 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Union Industrial Contractors 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE RP North Texas 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.