Pipe, duct and boiler insulation · Louisiana

Classic Industrial Services, Inc.

Baton Rouge, LA · ~430 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Classic Industrial Services, Inc. runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe, duct and boiler insulation workplace, earning a grade A.

Classic Industrial Services, Inc.: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Pipe, duct and boiler insulation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Classic Industrial Services, Inc. safety composite

Classic Industrial Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Classic Industrial Services, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Classic Industrial Services, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2019=0.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Baton Rouge, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #4/12
  • PHOTO Summit Contracting L…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~430 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Summit Contracting LLC - Portland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Classic Industrial Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Classic Industrial Services, Inc. averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Pipe, duct and boiler insulation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Classic Industrial Services, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2019=0.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Classic Industrial Services, Inc. falls in its industry

1,138 Pipe, duct and boiler insulati establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 12 Pipe, duct and boiler insulati employers in Louisiana.

Classic Industrial Services, Inc. (430 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Classic Industrial Services, Inc.
Classic Industrial Services, Inc. (430 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Classic Industrial Services, Inc. has more employees than the Pipe, duct and boiler insulation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.1 4 0 0
2023 0.7 0.1 7 0 0
2022 0.7 0.2 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · LA · Baton Rouge

1,138 Pipe, duct and boiler insulation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 781 employers in Baton Rouge, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Summit Contracting LLC - Portland 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spallinger Millwright 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conveyor Specialties Inc 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEC Construction LLC 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE HK8 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE Total Safety Specialized Safety Personnel Group 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newtron LLC 432 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frymaster 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEST REGION HEADQUARTERS 9,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC. 8,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR BATON ROUGE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baton Rouge 4,833 FTE
NAT-TCR PC1 Panama City Administration 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mansfield 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HAMMETT EXCAVATION, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Denver Plant 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Total Network Manufacturing LLC 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE CAR-FRESHNER Corporation 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sofo Foods of Ohio 430 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.