Building panels, corrugated and flat, plastics, manufacturing · Georgia

Classic Window Coverings LLC

Buford, GA · ~62 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Classic Window Coverings LLC runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building panels, corrugated and flat, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Classic Window Coverings LLC: 7.5 TCR = 228% of Building panels, corrugated and flat, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Classic Window Coverings LLC safety composite

Classic Window Coverings LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.0

2016→2022

Classic Window Coverings LLC injury rate improved

Classic Window Coverings LLC's TCR fell 12.0 from 12.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.0 · 2017=20.1 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=12.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Buford, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 228% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #89/103
  • PHOTO Acrofab, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Acrofab, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Classic Window Coverings LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Classic Window Coverings LLC averages 7.5 TCR (228% of the Building panels, corrugated and flat, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Classic Window Coverings LLC TCR series: 2016=12 · 2017=20.1 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=12.5 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Classic Window Coverings LLC falls in its industry

2,838 Building panels, corrugated an establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 103 Building panels, corrugated an employers in Georgia.

Classic Window Coverings LLC (62 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Classic Window Coverings LLC
Classic Window Coverings LLC (62 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Classic Window Coverings LLC has fewer employees than the Building panels, corrugated and flat, pl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 12.5 12.5 5 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 3 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2017 20.1 18.7 13 1 0
2016 12.0 12.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · GA · Buford

2,838 Building panels, corrugated and flat, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 164 employers in Buford, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Acrofab, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GPI Corporation 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Silicone Technologies 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kudzu Millwork 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE JACKSON EMC - JEFFERSON 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minola Operating 5215 Minola Dr 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brunswick Operating and Transmission Maintenance Center - 3951 & 3915 Community Rd. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bloomington 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tech Systems, Inc 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elringklinger USA, Inc. 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR GAORD - BUFORD CENTER 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR Georgia Branch 428 FTE
NAT-TCR H-E Parts International, Mining Solutions USA 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR UPHS-Portage 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Boise Supply Company 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Corridor Crossing Place 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE II in One Contractors 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lunds & Byerlys, Downtown St. Paul 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE 31 Phoenix Metals Charlotte 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Price Cutter # 55 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.