Residential construction, single-family, general contractors · Utah

Clawson General Contracting

South Jordan, UT · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clawson General Contracting runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Residential construction, single-family, general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Clawson General Contracting: 4.3 TCR = 114% of Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clawson General Contracting safety composite

Clawson General Contracting scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Clawson General Contracting: 0.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Clawson General Contracting's TCR rose 4.2 from 0.0 in 2018 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · South Jordan, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/17
  • PHOTO Corporate
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Clawson General Contracting in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clawson General Contracting averages 4.3 TCR (114% of the Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clawson General Contracting TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Clawson General Contracting falls in its industry

976 Residential construction, sing establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 17 Residential construction, sing employers in Utah.

Clawson General Contracting (52 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Clawson General Contracting
Clawson General Contracting (52 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Clawson General Contracting has more employees than the Residential construction, single-family, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 0.0 5 0 0
2023 5.9 0.0 6 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.1 0.0 4 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 7.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · UT · South Jordan

976 Residential construction, single-family, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 60 employers in South Jordan, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chandler, AZ 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hayden Homes LLC ID 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR McKee Management Associates, Inc. 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CTI Construction 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kapp Construction & Development Co., Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Axiom Constructors 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Climb Concrete 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Merit Medical 1,954 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ultradent Dental Manufacturing B1 925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intermountain Homecare & Hospice 842 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPI - Building 1 716 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Shore Public Schools 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Monticello High School 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at United Club Hnl Per Pax 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Orlando PDC 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bridgestone AOR 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerr Hickory 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muskingum Skilled Nursing & Rehab 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lunar Drive 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.