Belt conveyor systems manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc.

Souderton, PA · ~148 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Belt conveyor systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 88% of Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. safety composite

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc.: 2.9 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2024

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.8 from 2.9 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · Souderton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #7/19
  • PHOTO BWIS - Romeoville
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BWIS - Romeoville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=5 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. falls in its industry

361 Belt conveyor systems manufact establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 19 Belt conveyor systems manufact employers in Pennsylvania.

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. (148 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc.
Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. (148 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Clayton H. Landis Company, Inc. has more employees than the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 3.3 7 0 0
2023 5.0 3.6 6 1 0
2022 2.4 2.4 4 0 0
2021 2.5 1.9 4 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 3 0 0
2019 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 4 0 0
2017 2.1 0.7 3 0 0
2016 2.9 1.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · PA · Souderton

361 Belt conveyor systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 69 employers in Souderton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BWIS - Romeoville 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arrowhead Conveyor LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson -Mayrath Clay Center 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intelligrated now part of Honeywell-Danville Facility 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raccoon Service Center 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1100 State Street 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA PA Allentown 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fazio Mechanical Services - Pennsylvania 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR JBS Souderton INC 1,402 FTE
CITY-NEAR Almac Clinical Services LLC 764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Almac Clinical Technologies LLC 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leidy's Inc. 297 FTE
NAT-TCR 409 Geneseo 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Wellington at Southport 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bio-Nomic Services, Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Glencore Recycling, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Katzman Family Center for Living 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Savannah, GA 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Electrical Technologies 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oetiker Inc 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.