Automobile polishes and cleaners manufacturing · Wisconsin

Cleaning Systems, Inc.

Name: Cleaning Systems, Inc. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

De Pere, WI · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.3
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cleaning Systems, Inc. runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Automobile polishes and cleaners manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cleaning Systems, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 39% of Automobile polishes and cleaners manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cleaning Systems, Inc. safety composite

Cleaning Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2020

Cleaning Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Cleaning Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325612 · De Pere, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 39% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #3/13
PHOTO Atlanta West
BOOK 4y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atlanta West (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.3
Atlanta West

1.3
Clean Control

1.3
Certol Interna

1.3
NCH Corporatio

1.3

What this shows Cleaning Systems, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (39% of the Automobile polishes and cleaners manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Cleaning Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cleaning Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

143 Automobile polishes and cleane establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Automobile polishes and cleane employers in Wisconsin.

Cleaning Systems, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Cleaning Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Automobile polishes and cleaners manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2020	0.0	0.0	0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0
2016	5.1	2.6	1	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325612 · WI · De Pere

143 Automobile polishes and cleaners manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 96 employers in De Pere, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Atlanta West	FOREST PARK, GA	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Clean Control Corp	WARNER ROBINS, GA	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Certol International, LLC	COMMERCE CITY, CO	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	NCH Corporation - HQ	IRVING, TX	1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Spring Green	SPRING GREEN	48 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Select Sires Inc Westby	WESTBY	48 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Select Sires, Inc - Wisconsin	WESTBY	48 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Custer	CUSTER	48 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Belmark Wisconsin	De Pere	1,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Belmark De Pere	De Pere	775 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Robinson Inc	De Pere	572 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tweet/Garot Mechanical, Inc	De Pere	550 FTE
NAT-TCR	Heart Utilities of Jax Inc	Jacksonville, FL	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	South Carolina Casualty	Cayce, SC	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Flushing	Flushing, NY	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cummins Power Systems - Fridley	Fridley, MN	1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Nashville	Nashville, TN	48 FTE
NAT-SIZE	IPC	Chicago, IL	48 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Digital Lizard Idaho	Hayden, ID	48 FTE
NAT-SIZE	F3	Ft Wayne, IN	48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.