Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · Ohio

Cleveland Facility

Cleveland, OH · ~112 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cleveland Facility runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Cleveland Facility: 3.7 TCR = 113% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cleveland Facility safety composite

Cleveland Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cleveland Facility: 4.7 → 10.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2.76× in 2024

Cleveland Facility's TCR rose 5.6 from 4.7 in 2016 to 10.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Cleveland, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 113% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #12/20
  • PHOTO DFA FLUID - LEMARS I…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DFA FLUID - LEMARS IA - LINCOLN ST (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Cleveland Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cleveland Facility averages 3.7 TCR (113% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cleveland Facility TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2018=3 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=10.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Cleveland Facility falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 20 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in Ohio.

Cleveland Facility (112 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cleveland Facility
Cleveland Facility (112 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Cleveland Facility has fewer employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.3 10.3 9 0 0
2023 5.3 5.3 5 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 1 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.0 2.2 4 0 0
2016 4.7 3.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · OH · Cleveland

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DFA FLUID - LEMARS IA - LINCOLN ST 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFA FLUID - SPRINGFIELD OH 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Purity - Nashville 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFA FLUID - SAN ANTONIO TX 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tuttle Construction 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baker Construction Enterprises, Inc. 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fechko Excavating LLC 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hayden Valley Foods 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Lantos Adoption Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarke & Co., Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Yerba Buena Ice Skating and Bowling Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnetonka 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE El Cajon FHC 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solid State Devices Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ducts Unlimited Mechanical Systems Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glo Electric LLC 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.