Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Minnesota

Client Community Services, Inc.

Worthington, MN · ~117 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Client Community Services, Inc. runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade D.

Client Community Services, Inc.: 5.9 TCR = 156% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Client Community Services, Inc. safety composite

Client Community Services, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Client Community Services, Inc.: 0.0 → 85.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 85.2 TCR · DART/TCR 4.12× in 2024

Client Community Services, Inc.'s TCR rose 85.1 from 0.0 in 2017 to 85.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 4.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Worthington, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 156% of ind

  • DART 24.3 DART
  • RANK #52/112
  • PHOTO 1436 2213 HICKORY HI…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1436 2213 HICKORY HILL ROAD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Client Community Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Client Community Services, Inc. averages 5.9 TCR (156% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Client Community Services, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=12.5 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=85.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Client Community Services, Inc. falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 112 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Minnesota.

Client Community Services, Inc. (117 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Client Community Services, Inc.
Client Community Services, Inc. (117 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Client Community Services, Inc. has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 85.2 24.3 7 0 0
2023 7.6 1.5 5 0 0
2022 2.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 7.1 1.0 7 0 0
2020 12.5 4.8 13 0 0
2019 5.7 0.9 1 5 0
2018 5.8 5.8 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MN · Worthington

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 59 employers in Worthington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1436 2213 HICKORY HILL ROAD 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR U709-90 Geiger Road 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR UCP-ASPIR-AUDUBON/BROCK 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clinton House 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE WLS NextEra Analytics St Paul 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gardner Builders 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chard Excavating 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laketown Electric Corporation 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY - WORTHINGTON 2,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY WORTHINGTON 2,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bedford Industries 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN,WORTHINGTON - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 272 FTE
NAT-TCR Continuing Healthcare Shadyside LLC 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel De Anza 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 050 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnes Tree Service Inc 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Speed North America 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Petro MD - Baltimore 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6566 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6564 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.