Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Missouri

Clinton School District

Clinton, MO · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clinton School District runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade D.

Clinton School District: 4.4 TCR = 147% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clinton School District safety composite

Clinton School District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Clinton School District held a steady TCR band

Clinton School District's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 22.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=22.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Clinton, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 147% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #87/153
  • PHOTO U of Penn H House
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: U of Penn H House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Clinton School District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clinton School District averages 4.4 TCR (147% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clinton School District TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=22.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Clinton School District falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 153 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Missouri.

Clinton School District (21 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Clinton School District
Clinton School District (21 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Clinton School District has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 22.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · MO · Clinton

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 36 employers in Clinton, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR U of Penn H House 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GOOD SHEPHERD PENN PARTNERS RITTENHOUSE 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR UHA Team Dining 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellstar North Fulton Hospital - FNS 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GREEN HILLS #2-10 -EST 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Branches Farm 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tompkins Family Farms. LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Missouri 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Second Street Branch 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wal-Mart Branch 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio Street Branch 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR Four Seasons 316 FTE
NAT-TCR Fresenius Kabi, LLC - North Las Vegas Distribution Center 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Silver Creek Orchards, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Automotive Dealership 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C268 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE IfA-Hilo 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - York 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE R22 Dayton OH 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE R12 Greater Mid-Hudson NY 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.