Centralized administrative offices · Indiana

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_

Crawfordsville, IN · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Centralized administrative offices workplace, earning a grade C.

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Centralized administrative offices BLS 0.7 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ safety composite

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ held a steady TCR band

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Crawfordsville, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/35
  • PHOTO Cardinal Health 7000…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Centralized administrative offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ falls in its industry

1,475 Centralized administrative off establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 35 Centralized administrative off employers in Indiana.

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_
Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Closure Systems International, Inc. (aka - ATB_ has fewer employees than the Centralized administrative offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · IN · Crawfordsville

1,475 Centralized administrative offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 66 employers in Crawfordsville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mass General Brigham Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EATON CENTER OH 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eagle Valley CCGT 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville District Office 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur County REMC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Columbus 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSC Communications 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Book Company - Crawfordsville 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel-Indiana 765 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CA-Solmetric 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HI-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NY-03 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE M.S. Iron Works, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flagala Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marinemax East, Inc.-Glc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas Glass & Door Company, Ltd. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.