Homes for the elderly with nursing care · New York

Cloverwood Senior Living

Pittsford, NY · ~184 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cloverwood Senior Living runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Cloverwood Senior Living: 8.8 TCR = 136% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cloverwood Senior Living safety composite

Cloverwood Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cloverwood Senior Living held a steady TCR band

Cloverwood Senior Living's TCR held near 0.3 from 6.5 in 2017 to 6.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.5 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=6.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pittsford, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.8 · 136% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #439/616
  • PHOTO ALARIS HEALTH AT WES…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~184 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ALARIS HEALTH AT WEST ORANGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Cloverwood Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cloverwood Senior Living averages 8.8 TCR (136% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cloverwood Senior Living TCR series: 2017=6.5 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=6.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Cloverwood Senior Living falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #439 safest of 616 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in New York.

Cloverwood Senior Living (184 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cloverwood Senior Living
Cloverwood Senior Living (184 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cloverwood Senior Living has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.8 5.4 5 0 0
2023 13.8 13.8 7 0 0
2022 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2021 10.3 10.3 2 5 0
2020 11.4 11.4 8 0 0
2019 11.2 7.5 8 1 0
2018 7.3 6.0 6 0 0
2017 6.5 4.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Pittsford

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 25 employers in Pittsford, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ALARIS HEALTH AT WEST ORANGE 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN,Bemidji-Woodsedge-Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley View Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yazoo City Rehabilitation and Healthcare 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABC Refrigeration 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canandaigua Winery 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE EG Industries - Emerson 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Echelon Supply and Service- Liverpool 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schottland Family YMCA 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc (Lenel) 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Pittsford 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Highlands Living Center 190 FTE
NAT-TCR Arden Courts of Tampa 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trussworks, North 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Converted Products Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 08030-08-08-BELLINGHAM 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Structural Concrete 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Kinematics 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield Mo 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honolulu Hi 184 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.