Used merchandise stores · Illinois

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store

Chicago, IL · ~62 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Used merchandise stores workplace, earning a grade C.

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store: 3.5 TCR = 103% of Used merchandise stores BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store safety composite

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2022

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store injury rate improved

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store's TCR fell 1.4 from 4.0 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 453310 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 103% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #23/62
  • PHOTO ECM ATS ONLINE #88
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ECM ATS ONLINE #88 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store averages 3.5 TCR (103% of the Used merchandise stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.7 · BLS 3.4

Where Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store falls in its industry

1,556 Used merchandise stores establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 62 Used merchandise stores employers in Illinois.

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store (62 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store
Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store (62 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Clybourn Ave. Chicago Store has more employees than the Used merchandise stores median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2020 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2019 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

453310 · IL · Chicago

1,556 Used merchandise stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ECM ATS ONLINE #88 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Industries of Central NC -Corporate, #011, #027, #099, #208 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Las Vegas South NV DI 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Ind - NW Ohio Defiance Retail Store 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dupont Pioneer Mcleansboro MCL1 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hinsdale Nurseries, Inc. - Plano 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE 03U - Electric Field Meter Services 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Gas Tech Services 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corporation (Lebanon) 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR South Bay 32180 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unical MRO 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5287 Jackson, MS 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG217 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati South 38310 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Coast Lighting & Energy 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMS - Kalamazoo, MI 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.