Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · New Mexico

CMC Rebar Albuquerque

Albuquerque, NM · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMC Rebar Albuquerque runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade C.

CMC Rebar Albuquerque: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMC Rebar Albuquerque safety composite

CMC Rebar Albuquerque scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.8

2016→2024

CMC Rebar Albuquerque injury rate improved

CMC Rebar Albuquerque's TCR fell 14.8 from 14.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Albuquerque, NM ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P61
  • PHOTO EMIT Technologies, I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EMIT Technologies, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

CMC Rebar Albuquerque in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMC Rebar Albuquerque averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMC Rebar Albuquerque TCR series: 2016=14.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CMC Rebar Albuquerque falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
CMC Rebar Albuquerque (24 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CMC Rebar Albuquerque
CMC Rebar Albuquerque (24 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

CMC Rebar Albuquerque has fewer employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2022 5.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 7.1 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 14.8 11.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · NM · Albuquerque

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EMIT Technologies, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Sabre FWT Sioux City Iowa 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gerdau- Atlanta RS 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Us Millwright services 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbus Electric Cooperative, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE EPCOR Clovis Water, EPCOR Water New Mexico Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE EMCO of Santa Fe, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Organ Mountain Solar and Electric 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1001 Franklin Ave 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 370 East Main St 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Linamar North Carolina 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE VDF Singer 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kenron Main 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Natrona Heights Store 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.