Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Texas

CMC Rebar Houston East

Houston, TX · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMC Rebar Houston East runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade A.

CMC Rebar Houston East: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMC Rebar Houston East safety composite

CMC Rebar Houston East scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CMC Rebar Houston East held a steady TCR band

CMC Rebar Houston East's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/182
  • PHOTO Quality Steel Fabric…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CMC Rebar Houston East in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMC Rebar Houston East averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMC Rebar Houston East TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CMC Rebar Houston East falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 182 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Texas.

CMC Rebar Houston East (35 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CMC Rebar Houston East
CMC Rebar Houston East (35 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

CMC Rebar Houston East has fewer employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · TX · Houston

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Steel Fabricators, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vulcraft South Carolina 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Rebar Houston West 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Harris Rebar Mid-Atlantic LLC (Baltimore Facility) 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Lab Research and Testing 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kentucky - Metals 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR US Ecology Boston (West) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jack Batte & Sons, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arboris LLC Newark 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Baton Rouge 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Tile & Carpet, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Village of Geneseo 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.