Distribution of electric power · Maine

CMP - Belfast Service Building

Belfast, ME · ~22 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMP - Belfast Service Building runs at 312% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

CMP - Belfast Service Building: 3.7 TCR = 312% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMP - Belfast Service Building safety composite

CMP - Belfast Service Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

CMP - Belfast Service Building injury rate improved

CMP - Belfast Service Building's TCR fell 0.4 from 4.2 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=9.0 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Belfast, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.7 · 312% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #15/28
  • PHOTO Middle Tennessee Ele…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Middle Tennessee Electric (Wilson County Office) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

CMP - Belfast Service Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMP - Belfast Service Building averages 3.7 TCR (312% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMP - Belfast Service Building TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=9 · 2022=4 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 1.2

Where CMP - Belfast Service Building falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 28 Distribution of electric power employers in Maine.

CMP - Belfast Service Building (22 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMP - Belfast Service Building
CMP - Belfast Service Building (22 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CMP - Belfast Service Building has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2023 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 9.0 9.0 2 0 0
2020 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2016 4.2 4.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · ME · Belfast

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 26 employers in Belfast, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Middle Tennessee Electric (Wilson County Office) 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Plains Electric Cooperative 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUMA, Caguas Fleet Operations Warehouse 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ocmulgee Electric Membership Corporation 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Downeast Institute 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMP - Skowhegan Service Building 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dover Service Building 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Douston Construction 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waldo- 118 Northport Ave 578 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08241 - Store # 8241 Belfast 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mathews Brothers Company 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duck Trap River of Maine 181 FTE
NAT-TCR Heritage Manor of Ville Platte 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Avera Flandreau Hospital 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnes Aerospace East Granby Division 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR UFP Parker LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Modern Welding Company of Kentucky, Inc. (Madisonville) 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE NELIN 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE MOSPR 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE MNWIN 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.