Distribution of electric power · Maine

CMP - Bridgton Service Building

Bridgton, ME · ~27 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMP - Bridgton Service Building runs at 352% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

CMP - Bridgton Service Building: 4.2 TCR = 352% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMP - Bridgton Service Building safety composite

CMP - Bridgton Service Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CMP - Bridgton Service Building: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 13.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.69× in 2024

CMP - Bridgton Service Building's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Bridgton, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.2 · 352% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #18/28
  • PHOTO Blue Grass Energy
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue Grass Energy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

CMP - Bridgton Service Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMP - Bridgton Service Building averages 4.2 TCR (352% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMP - Bridgton Service Building TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=13.6 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 1.2

Where CMP - Bridgton Service Building falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 28 Distribution of electric power employers in Maine.

CMP - Bridgton Service Building (27 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMP - Bridgton Service Building
CMP - Bridgton Service Building (27 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CMP - Bridgton Service Building has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2021 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2019 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2017 13.6 3.4 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · ME · Bridgton

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 11 employers in Bridgton, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue Grass Energy 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Catskill 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRUESDALE TRAINING FACILITY 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dickinson Service Center 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Versant Power Illinois Ave 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE JALBEAR BROTHERS POWERLINE CONSTRUCTION 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE HAMPDEN BRIDGES 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cianbro Fabrication Coating 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgton Hospital 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08167 - Store # 8167 Bridgton 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8167 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winona Camps 61 FTE
NAT-TCR Blue Grass Energy 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Basden Industrial Group 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Jennmar of Pennsylvania LLC 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Carpentersville 33 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anderson Electric, Inc. / Mattoon Branch 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE XRN 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Lexington Park Site (1379) 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston Place 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.